top of page
55892-1413290192612.jpeg.webp

Political Process Theory

Relevant Authors: Sidney Tarrow, David Snow, David Meyer, and Douglas McAdam

 

The Political Process Theory (PPT) deals with the "organizational dynamics of collective action" (Mc.Adam et al., 1999). In addition to analyzing the cohesion and organization of the movement, PPT focuses on the context of the political opportunities available at a given time, this implies the "external resources" to the movement (Tarrow, 2011).

According to PPT, the emergence of social movements is the consequence of the concurrence of three factors: political opportunities, established organizations and shared ideas, legitimizing and catalyzing collective action.

Explore Cherán's movement through Douglas McAdam's three key sets of elements of the political process model:
 

Screen Shot 2022-12-09 at 5.10.17 PM.png
Screen Shot 2022-12-10 at 1.19.16 PM.png
Screen Shot 2022-12-10 at 1.22.57 PM.png

Definition: The broad social process that served to undermine the calculations and assumptions on which the Cherán movement was structured.


 

Screen Shot 2022-12-14 at 7.36.10 PM.png

Environmental exploitation and resource dispossession

  • Since the 1970s land conflicts have intensified in Mexico largely due to the development of "agrarian capitalism" in which landowners developed manufacturing and became small businessmen (Castile, 1974). 

  • In Cherán, this developmentalist stage was marked by agrarian power groups that, with clientelist practices at the local and state level, profited from the forest through the control of the communal property commissariat (Calderón Mólgora, 2004).

  • In addition, poorly established boundaries and land invasion and land grabbing by private landowners led to other community conflicts.

  • During the last half of the 20th century, other factors that led to the increase of natural resource dispossession were the intensification of migration to the USA and the consequent abandonment of the countryside, as well as the advance of violence fostered by organized crime groups in different regions of Michoacán, which, among other actions, have intervened in the intensification of avocado monoculture (Gasparello, 2018; Pérez-Llorente, et., al., 2019). 

  • Between 2008 and 2011, avocado plantations and clandestine logging in Cherán affected approximately 9,000 hectares of forests (España-Boquera and Champo-Jiménez, 2016; Osorno, et. al., 2018).

  • The loggers and the territorial advance of organized crime impacted the forests near the spring of La Cofradía, a place of high environmental and cultural value for the villagers, which triggered the uprising of April 15, 2011. For this reason, the conflict can be considered socio-environmental. 

  • Most studies concerned with the development of the autonomous movement in Cherán point to the root causes of the democratic crisis in Mexico, its alienation of indigenous peoples and the resulting need for political alternatives.

  • The Cherán insurgency was greatly influenced by the unfair Mexican social and political system, which excludes, marginalizes, and discriminates against subaltern groups, primarily indigenous communities (Aragón, 2016).

  • The Mexican construction of ‘citizenship’ – agreed upon during the 19th century by a white elite – excluded indigenous collectivities and denied their rights to self-determination (Nelson, 2007). 

  • Cherán’s mobilization was thus to an attempt to disrupt hegemonic discourses of citizenship and democracy in Mexico.

  • Historically the region of the P'urhépecha plateau has remained relatively well organized.

  • Since the arrival of Europeans in the sixteenth century after the process of conquest and the long night of the colony, the different towns of the region (today known as Santa Fe de la Laguna, Pátzcuaro, Tzintzuntzan, Cucuchucho, Janitzio, Carapan, Tacuro, Huancito, Sopoco, Santo Tomás, Tanaquillo, Uren, Chilchota, Etucuaro, Cherán, Ichan, Acachuen, Terecuato, Terejero and Nurío) have fought to preserve their community organization based on indigenous traditions of social and economic organization.

Prolonged insecurity and violence

  • Since the early 2000s, organized criminal syndicates, like the drug cartel La Familia, created in Michoacán, had acted like a state within a state, making their own rules and meting out grisly punishments to those who did not obey their commands.

Organized crime meets environmental exploitation

  • Historically, forest resources and their derivatives have been the basic pillar of the livelihoods of the people of Cherán.

  • The defense of the forest was the arena in which the first events of Cherán's history of insurrection were unleashed –– in the context of insecurity and political instability derived from the policies of the fight against organized crime undertaken in 2006.

  • While for years Cherán had suffered from the illegal exploitation of its forest resources by small-scale loggers, it was not until the emergence of a new player that the outlook for the Cherán people changed radically (Ventura, 2012): Gangs of talamontes linked to organized crime groups broke into the municipality and employed violent tactics of intimidation to plunder Cherán's forests within a few years.

  • It is estimated that in six years a total of 9069.35 hectares of forest were lost, which represents an average of 1500 hectares per year. This corresponds to a loss of 71.24% of the 12,730.48 hectares of forest that Cherán had in 2006. Most of the deforestation occurred between 2010 and 2011 (2815 hectares) and was concentrated in the area closest to the urban core (Spain and Champo, 2016).

Corruption and distrust in the government

  • Increasing social violence and environmental exploitation were legitimized by the corruption of both municipal and state authorities.

  • Government officials allied themselves with opponents of the movement and ignored facts such as the murder and forced disappearance of some community members.

  • This was compounded by divisions between supporters of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) and those of the Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD), which deepened during the last electoral process in the municipality (2007).

V Shape

Political opportunities are the driving force behind collective action.
 

  • The main incentive at the collective level was to stop the devastation of the community's sources of life (forest and water).

  • In addition, there were other specific incentives, such as the fight for more security in the community, due to the acts of violence against those who opposed the dispossession of natural resources.

  • In macro-social terms, the institutional weakness was a political opportunity to return to traditional indigenous forms of community organization.

  • Finally, while some internal struggles were being waged between groups of the political party (PRD) that had governed the municipality of Cherán from 1989 to 2007 and the dominant party in the country (PRI), the population of Cherán took over the municipal presidency of Cherán, which found in its own resources and community organizational structures the strength to confront the violent appropriation of its resources by its adversaries.

Sources:

  1. Aragón, O., 2013. “El derecho en insurrección. el uso contrahegemónico del derecho en el movimiento purépecha de Cherán”. Revista de Estudios y Pesquisas sobre as Américas, vol. 7(2), pp. 33-69.

  2. Bautista Rojas, Enrique, "La recuperación de la tradición indígena en la lucha del pueblo de Cherán", en María de los Ángeles Trejo González y Milagros Pichardo Hernández (comps.), Memoria electrónica IV Coloquio de Investigación Educativa, PDF, 2012.       

  3. Estrada Álvarez, Jairo, Capitalismo criminal, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, 2008.         

  4. Flores Nández, Nancy, La farsa detrás de la guerra contra el narco, Océano, México, 2012.  

  5. Gasparello Giovanna 2007 “Administración autónoma de la justicia y su relación con el estado: la Policía Comunitaria de Guerrero.” M.S. thesis in anthropological sciences, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.

  6. Giddens, Anthony, Un mundo desbocado, Editorial Santillana, Madrid, 2000.         

  7. INEGI, Diversidad. Michoacán de Ocampo, [http://cuentame.inegi.org.mx/monografias/informacion/mich/poblacion/diversidad.aspx?tema=me&e=16], consultado 15 de septiembre de 2014.

  8. Gómez Durán, Thelma, "El pueblo que espantó al miedo" en Elia Baltazar et.al., Entre las cenizas, Periodistas de a pie, México, 2013.         [ Links ]

  9. IDCM, [www.internal-displacement.org], consultado14 de noviembre 2013.

  10. Long, Norman, "Globalización y localización: nuevos retos" en Lara Flores, Sara María y Michel Chauvet (coords.), La sociedad rural mexicana frente al nuevo milenio, Plaza y Valdés, México, 1996.        

  11. Morales Vega, María Cristina, "Resistencia, lucha y reconocimiento de derechos del pueblo purépecha de Cherán, monografía, UACM, 2013.         [ Links ]

  12. Calveiro, P., 2014. “Repensar y ampliar la democracia. El caso del municipio autónomo de Cherán K’eri”. Argumentos, vol. 27(25), pp. 193-212.

  13. Campo, A., y G. Partida, 2015. “Cumple Cherán cuatro años de autogobierno, sin partidos”. La Jornada (abril). Available at: http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2015/04/20/estados/029n1est

  14. España-Boquera, M., y O. Champo-Jiménez, 2016. “Proceso de deforestación en el municipio de Cherán, Michoacán, México (2006- 2012)”. Madera y Bosques, vol. 22(1), pp. 141-153.

  15. Ibarra, M., y J. Castillo, 2014. “Las elecciones de Cherán: usos y costumbres excluyentes”. Revista Mexicana de Derecho Electoral, 5, pp. 263-283. UNAM-Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas.

  16. Llanderal, M., 2012. Editorial. Expresiones: Órgano oficial de difusión del Instituto Electoral del Michoacán, 15, pp. 9-10.

  17. Notimex, 2012. “El Consejo Mayor del Gobierno comunal de Cherán toma posesión”. Expansión, domingo 5 de febrero de 2012. Available at: http://expansion.mx/nacional/2012/02/05/el-consejo-mayor-del-gobierno-comunal-de-cheran-toma-posesion?internal_source=PLAYLIST

  18. Ojeda, L., 2015. “Cherán: el poder del consenso y las políticas comunitarias”. Política Común, vol. 7., Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/pc.12322227.0007.007

  19. Sedesol, 2013. Cherán. Unidad de microrregiones. Available at: http://www.microrregiones.gob.mx/zap/datGenerales.aspx?entra=zap&ent=16&mun=024

  20. Ventura, P., 2012. “Proceso de autonomía en Cherán. Movilizar el derecho”. Espiral. Estudios sobre Estado y Sociedad, vol. XIX(55), pp. 157-176.

bottom of page